I have a map service in which there are 2 feature classes. Essentially one is a set of polygons and the other is an aggregation of contiguous polygons; a unique ID is assigned to each grouping of contiguous polygons and these polygons are related to the un-aggregated ones. The short way to explain this is a 1:M relationship.
Even though i'm querying the aggregated polygons as the target map service (but using the related attribute fields as query fields), the results contain every record which matches, rather than just the single value contained within the aggregated feature class.
Is this expected behavior?
Even though i'm querying the aggregated polygons as the target map service (but using the related attribute fields as query fields), the results contain every record which matches, rather than just the single value contained within the aggregated feature class.
Is this expected behavior?